Manuscript review

Recommendation

1.Publish after minor changes

2.Publish unaltered

3.Review again after major changes

4.Reject (Paper is not of sufficient quality or novelty to be published in this Journal)

5.Reject (Paper is seriously flawed; do not encourage resubmission.)

A.evaluation

1.How do you evaluate the manuscript?

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

B.Content

1.Is this paper of original value?

Yes, definitely

To some extent

Hardly

I cannot judge this

2. Is this paper scientifically correct?

Yes

Probably, although all details have not been checked

Doubtful

3. To what extent will the results be useful for other scientists?

Large

Average

Small

4. How would you characterize the level of the paper?

For experts only

Useful for people working in related fields

Understandable also for nonspecialists

Superficial

6.Is the bibliography reasonable?

Yes

After minor modifications

No

C.Presentation

1.Is this title adequate?

Yes

No

2.Does the abstract give a correct description of the content?

Yes

No

3.Is the general organization of the paper acceptable?

Yes

No

4.With respect to the content, is the length of the paper reasonable?

Yes

No, should be increased

No, should be decreased

5.How do you rate readability?

Good

Some effort needed

Large effort needed